VISA is a real Terrorist

Credit card companies are real terrorists by charging unconscionable interest, and the Islamic extremists that we call terrorist are prohibited by their religion to lend money at interest.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

This entry was posted on Sunday, May 30th, 2010 at 7:23 pm and is filed under Credit card. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

10 Responses to “VISA is a real Terrorist”

  1. DaddyDoctor123 Says:

    truth haha

  2. CmacD87 Says:

    There oughta be a law!

  3. FreiheitKampfer Says:

    interest is just time preference.
    It is wrong to prevent people from voluntarily making arrangements with on another.

    Don’t appeal to religion. Don’t you remember? Opiate of the Masses. I can hardly believe that he is actually defending unfounded religious nonsense.

    ~secular individualist anarcho-capitalist

  4. bapyou Says:

    Credit card companies always ask you to send your payments to an office that is farthest away from your home. That way the mail may arrive late and they can charge you their fees.

  5. CosmicFork Says:

    When we dismantled the most ancient of human laws, the law against usury, that’s when we found out what happens when an advanced industrial economy tries to function with NO cap at all, on interest rates. When banks get 25 percent to 30 percent on credit cards, and 500 or more percent on payday loans, capital flees from honest pursuits, like manufacturing. Capital has been pouring out of manufacturing, with its “low” profits, and into the financial sector. Great for the banks, terrible for us!

  6. OMikrosIroas Says:

    All religion is based on mythology.

  7. FreiheitKampfer Says:

    How is anyone harmed by a voluntary arrangement of this kind? The legal balance between the ‘fraud’ of one and the ‘neglect’ of the other is, of course, not a problem settled in a comment box.

    ~Those terms don’t define me, but only help to approximate me. I try not to take anything for granted, even if their are connotatively assumed in a title. What’s in a name? ‘anarcho-capitalist’ means a lot more than ‘Steven’

  8. sinplicity0 Says:

    Someone wrote here “Islam is the Truth.” I ask, whose Truth? Is there only one Truth?

  9. nicesooo Says:

    Islam is the Truth.

  10. ManicStreetStevO Says:

    Unless that arrangement harms a third, or is derived of one half’s being purposely misled. He is hardly “appealing to religion”, he is merely using it as an example relevant to the language of today’s global politics. All labels that one ascribes one’s self to require that you lose a certain amount of your own independent thought. And here you have managed to string three of them together.

    ~Steven as himself.

 

Leave a Reply